Saturday, May 26, 2018

Earth Changes Planet 9

Earth Changes
 Planet 9

Republicans announce they're going after Hillary Clinton, 
Comey, Lynch and others in DOJ and FBI for crimes

All government employees on 30 day notice

Trump put all government employees on 30 day notice
with sudden Executive Order Overnight

Trump Puts Obama (Barry Soetoro) on the Run

Trump Puts Obama (Barry Soetoro) on the Run 
after issuing this final warning


Obama had more than one agency
 and more than one spy on Trump 

Obama on the run after being caught red handed
 as the SPY against Trump

Obama on his heels as NEW EVIDENCE

On the Lord's Day (the 7th Day) - The Ark of the Covenant

The Divinity of Jesus Christ CONFIRMED

In a book entitled "The Ark of the Covenant," Jonathan Gray from Australia tells how skeptical he was at first of Ron Wyatt's claimed archaeological discoveries in the Holy Land.  However, upon investigating further, he developed a profound appreciation for Wyatt's work. INLAND ADVENTURER  The Ark of the Covenant March 2005, Pg. 20  

Gray related the following: In 1982 a young Arab boy (pseudoname of 'James' to protect his identity) crawled with Wyatt through a vast system of caves and tunnels underneath Golgotha and the Temple Mount. James came upon a tiny opening of a chamber and crawled into it.  Then -- frantically -- he came tumbling back out shaking and shouting, "What's in there?  I'm not going back in there!"  Wyatt saw in his eyes sheer, complete and utter terror, yet James said he had seen nothing?  Whatever he experienced was real, for he left not only that chamber, but the entire cave system, never to return! 

"James" reaction sparked a hesitant excitement in Wyatt.  He would never have given that chamber another look if not for "James" terror. 

Now alone in this vast cave system, Wyatt took his hammer and chisel, enlarged the hole and began crawling through.  Shining his flashlight down through the massive pile of large rocks, his eye caught a glimpse of something shiny.  Animal skins were covering a gold-veneered table with a raised moulding around the side which consisted of an alternating pattern of a bell and pomegranate.  It only took him a moment to realize that -- at the least -- this WAS an object from the first temple in Jerusalem!

Wyatt discovered many more items that had been missing for millennia from Solomon's temple, including the famous Ark of the Covenant, which houses the Ten Commandments!

Wyatt discovered a crack in the ceiling where a black, dry substance had fallen at some time in the distant past.  It had splashed onto a stone case where he was standing.  By now, he was aware the Ark of the Covenant was in that stone case. 

But a most overwhelming realization hit him suddenly when it became apparent to him that it was the blood of Jesus Christ that had dropped from a 20-foot thick crack in the stone ceiling above him, a crack created by the earthquake which happened at the moment of Christ's crucifixion thousands of years ago -- blood had actually fallen from the site where Christ had been crucified on the Cross, directly onto the stone case housing the Mercy Seat!!

The rectangular hole was the socket that held Jesus' cross!  Two other similar holes held the crosses of the two thieves who were crucified with Jesus.  When the full realization of the incredible significance, the awesomeness and magnitude of what had just happened dawned on Wyatt, he fainted!!  Wyatt later provided evidence to the authorities that he had indeed found items from the original temple.  

Geneticists were able to prove the rehydrated blood samples taken from the crack in the ceiling below the Crucifixion site were actually those of Jesus Christ, and it also *proved the virgin birth, genetically! [Ed., When the Israeli geneticists finally asked whose blood sample it was, Ron Wyatt, with tears in his eyes replied, "Your Messiah."]  

Jonathan Gray adds the words of the prophecy that God's "..Holy One would not see corruption," which explains why the blood samples could be rehydrated.

Counting of the chromosome under an electron microscope (which was video taped) showed that the cells had only 24 chromosomes, 23 X-chromosomes from the woman, and one Y-chromosome.  The usual number of chromosomes is 46, 23 X-chromosomes from the woman and 23 X or Y-chromosomes from the man.  This condition is extremely rare, if present at all in other than this blood.

An article entitled, The boy whose blood has no father published by David Bonthron and his colleagues at Edinburgh University in Nature Genetics (Vol. 11, p 164) talked about a 3-year old boy whose white blood cells had only X chromosomes, normally a signal for a female (a skin sample showed normal chromosome counts).  Normally haploidy individuals cannot survive (as opposed to duploidy, having two sets of chromosomes).  At least one Y-chromosome is required to trigger the production of a male. 


Excerpt from an email I received earlier this morning.  Bob, who has a prophetic gift, was just given this exciting word from the Lord below on 05-24-18.   ...........  

Bob -  "In preparing to read The Word this morning (at 02:40), without a forethought, The Father spoke and said, "The glory and power of The Ark Of The Covenant will soon be revealed to the world!!  It has been found and kept safe and secure unto this day and time.  All of the utensils and articles for service have been secured and kept for this time...[That is] My Timing!  Angels have kept and guarded The Ark Of The Covenant, each of the utensils, and articles for Temple Service!! Soon the world will know...I Am That I Am...and There Is No Other But Me...FOR I AM GOD!!!  Preparations have been made....Are you prepared?  Is the world ready and prepared for My coming?! For in a day and hour that you do not even consider My Coming —- I tell you...I Will Come!  Be ready!!!  Be prepared!!!"

Prior to receiving this prophetic word, Bob did not know of the 'Indiana Jones-type' Christian explorer, Mr. Ron Wyatt, nor his famous archaeological discoveries in the Holy Land which included not only the path of the Israelis through the Red Sea and the accompanying treasure trove of broken chariot parts, wheels, iron axles, etc., but most interestingly the Ark of the Covenant. Bob's prophetic word from the Lord, given this past Thursday, verifies what Ron Wyatt saw many decades ago that God says will be revealed to the world soon.  What fascinating times we are living in! 

Another prayer warrior and world travelers for the Lord, Henry Gruver, spoke about this with Ron Wyatt!  It's true. Two Angels are guarding the place!  There is a video tape as well in the place with the Ark of the covenant.  The two angels that greeted Ron Wyatt made the video and they said it would be revealed to the world at the time of the end.  The DNA of the blood on the Mercy seat is the blood of Jesus.  No other blood on the planet exists like it. Believer Ron Wyatt found it, apparently, directly under Golgotha (Calvary!) years ago; behind the East Jerusalem Bus Station.  He took [dried] blood samples and then closed his tunneling entrance back up.

Bob had never heard of Ron Wyatt or Henry Gruver, or anything about Wyatt’s geological expeditions. Ron took the blood sample to Israeli geneticists who rehydrated the blood sample of Jesus Christ which *proved His virgin birth genetically!  The Bible prophesied that God's "Holy One would not see corruption," which explains why the blood samples could be rehydrated.

An article written by the late Dr. Byron W. Ross, PhD., from a Ridgecrest, California newspaper, 'Inland Inspiration,' is included below.  It gives a brief synopsis of events leading up to this amazing discovery which adds verification to this latest prophetic word.

Byron W. Ross, PhD.
Extract From Article Published:  The Inland Adventurer  March 2005,  Pg. 20

A number of people have asked the question, "Why not send some Levites in to get the Ark?"  Per a section of the Ron's sons' Zedekiah cave video (4:43-6:35) (and alluded to in Ron's Zedekiah cave video part 7), they mention an incident in which the Israeli government sent 6 supposed Levites into the tunnel system (via Zedekiah's cave) towards the Ark.  All 6 were struck dead!  Ron had to fly to Israel to assist with removing the bodies from the cave. 

Question to the debunkers:  WHY would the Lord God/Jesus Christ allow Ron Wyatt to discover, view, take pictures of and publish his findings and still live to tell about it WHEN ALL OTHERS were killed on the spot never to reveal anything (other than little 'James' crawling out of the cave scared to death and refusing to go back in!). The Lord has allowed ONLY Wyatt to have this privilege and the entire world refuses to believe and receive the evidence, in particular that Wyatt was the ONLY one to live to tell about it when even Israelis were killed on the spot for daring to enter the cave where the Ark was without the permission of the Lord!!!  The people of this planet to this day, for the most part, refuse to accept Jesus as the Son of God, the Savior of all mankind who will receive Him - to their own peril - and the praise the Lord for what He has finally allowed to be revealed to confirm His Divinity.  Sad. No doubt there will be all manner of negative 'comments' about this article as well. So be it. They don't have to be published. Only those who respect the Father and His Son may be published. I, for one, will NOT participate in blasphemy against the Father and His Son.

 Danny and Ronnie Wyatt
Zedekiah's Cave  Israel
Talking about the door leading to the Ark
and a little about their father's character 
May 21 2008


 Ron in Zedekiah's Cave Pt 7

God has permitted Ron to behold and report what He will not allow others to do or see.  The Ark is very sacred and still holy, set apart and protected.  Woe be to those who try to mess around with it, who are not commissioned by God to do so.  Amen!  Come, Lord Jesus! --

Friday, May 25, 2018


MAY 23 2018



Anunnaki Slaughter Russian Soldiers in Syria

Nibiru Anunnaki Slaughter 

Russian Soldiers in Syria


From Conception...To Election

WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.
Editors note: The records alluded to in this story were discovered through a May, 2012 search through BMD Registers, a BNA partner site, using the search term "Obama". Corroborating evidence through public sources only implicates the identity of those involved but does not explicitly prove their identity in the absence of the availability of original documents.
By Dan Crosby of The Daily Pen

KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain.
The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.
In the absence of honor, courage and justice on the part of those serving in the U.S. Congress and Federal Judiciary, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case investigative group has concluded the only law enforcement analysis of the image of Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to a government website in April, 2011 and found it to be the product of criminal fraud and document forgery.
The seeming endless evidence against Obama has now taken investigators to the foreign archives of Great Britain wherein it has been discovered that vital events occurring under the jurisdiction of the British Colony in the Protectorate of East Africa prior to 1965 were recorded and held in the main office of the British Registrar in England until 1995 before being archived in the BNA.
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
Recall, investigative journalists working for have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya. Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly. Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials as the Obama administration has coincidentally paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.
Also, the presence of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington.
Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent high school graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961). 
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records, first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961.
Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To-date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).
The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives.
According to researchers, Obama’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.
However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.
Several sources show that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.

For someone who 'wanted to remain in America', it’s difficult to imagine any reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…
The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed in the very same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn’t “get the memo” that he was a daddy.
On August 31st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder neglected to name his newborn son on an application for extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S.

Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.
Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real Father” presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT the biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” which was posted to the internet by the administration in April of 2011. The document image has since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software.

However, the sad and pathetic truth about Obama’s covert natal history and his illegitimacy lies at the bottom of a sordid pit of lies surrounding the paternity of his birth. Doubts about his identity, his eligibility, his intentions, his honesty and his honorability as a man stem from what appears to be an ugly truth about his mother’s probable sexual involvement with multiple men associated with the radical socialist movement in 1960’s Hawaii.
Obama and his horde of abettors defend an improbable narrative about his identity. The veracity of this narrative has been damaged under the weight of a steady stream of crushing evidence demonstrating more than 180 disparities and contradictions to Obama’s claims of natal legitimacy as president.

If Obama’s cause as a usurper of power is to avenge his father’s culture, he made the worst possible error in lying about who he is. Vintage America is on to him. Their instincts are slowly turning Obama’s fantasy of a socialist utopia for those he believes are humanity’s offended into a laughing stock. By building his 'vision for America' on clay feet of lies about who he is, he has undermined any intention of doing something good and right. He is not to be trusted.

Moreover, Obama is learning the painful lesson that a message of “Hope and Change” means something vastly different to vintage America, the most powerful and affluent culture in human history, when that message has been proven to come from someone as audaciously dishonest and deceptively calculating as this son of otherness.

Recall, in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital records history that birth certificates are often amended after the birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the child.

In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571. In some cases, the biological father may not even know he is the father if the mother has had more than one sexual partner prior to the pregnancy.
There was no DNA test in 1961; however, the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report shows there were more than 1000 such “illegitimate” births reported in the state of Hawaii during that year, about 1 in 17.

Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the biological father. This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery. Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by authorized persons under Hawaiian law.

However, notations indicating that a certificate contains updated paternal information would be typed or printed in the lower margin of the new certificate below the signature section. This lower margin of the image of Obama’s certificate has been shown by computer experts to be concealed by forgers using a “clipping mask”. A clipping mask is a feature available in Adobe software which limits the viewable area on a document image through which only selected information can be seen. In the case of Obama’s forged certificate, the information we have been allowed to see within the frame of the clipping mask may merely reflect an amended birth record while concealing notations of the amendments which exists in the lower margin outside the frame of the clipping mask.
Regardless of any level of truth about any individual piece of information in the image, overall, the final image is the product of criminals and liars.

If Obama is not the biological father, or if paternal information is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama’s eligibility. Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in American history.
Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a revelation would cause.

Cowardly judges refuse to allow any exposure Obama’s actual natural born identity and, in their dereliction, have conjured a legal fantasy filled with pressurizing wrath in which a candidate’s eligibility for president is not only declared legally uncontestable but is also automatically preeminent. In allowing this, judges have allowed a dangerous precedent in which any foreign invader can covertly usurp the power of the U.S. government simply by lying about their citizenship status and hiding documentation with the help of the American media and a complicit legal system.

On his application, when asked the name and address of his spouse, it appears Obama may have first written the name of his actual wife in Kenya before blacking it out and writing “Ann S. Dunham”.
Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S. There is no evidence or testimony that Obama ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been engaged. The two did not live together before or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with the State of Hawaii.
Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However, images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of Dunham’s child. A review of the court documents shows that at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.
Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward allowing a foreign spouse to remain in the U.S. However, no marriage license application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama had even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham. This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama’s relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the birth of her child.
From the perspective of an INS agent, the circumstances surrounding Obama’s relationship with Dunham would have raised suspicions. Immigration fraud was rampant during Hawaii’s foreign birth accommodation era in the 1960’s.
Since Obama was a foreigner wanting to extend his temporary visa, the INS certainly understood that by claiming a marriage to Dunham, it would promote INS approval of an extension, but in Dunham’s case there was an added risk to the relationship for Obama…she was pregnant. 
It appears, from the contents of documents in Obama’s INS file, when pressed by INS agents and school officials on the actual validity of his relationship to Dunham and baby Obama, having certainly been advised of legal ramifications for lying, he refused to name Obama as his child but maintained that he was married to Dunham. This indicates that Obama was either not certain if he was the biological father, or that he knew he wasn’t.
Under child protection laws in many states, including Hawaii, when the biological father is deceased or unidentified by the mother, the man who is married to the mother at the time she gives birth automatically becomes the father named on the official birth certificate until it is proven in court that he is not the biological father. “Mandatory Legitimacy” applies even if the birth is the result of adultery, when the mother is married at the time of birth, until paternity is successfully contested. Today, DNA testing allows for conclusive determinations about paternity, but in 1961, it was more difficult to determine paternity. Hawaii’s child welfare statutes indicate the “statutory” father’s name on the certificate may be removed by court order, if paternity is successfully contested, after a judge has decided the case in the interest of the child’s welfare. This law is intended to protect the child if the mother dies.
Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama’s alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaii in the course of their duties to verify his eligibility. The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of president when he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the commission.
Ignorance, lies and lack of understanding about the difference between a medically verified birth and a legal registration of birth has confused the public about Obama’s natal history and eligibility.
Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.
The elder Obama’s name appears as the father of a newborn son in images of two birth announcements appearing in two Honolulu newspapers on August 13th and 14th, 1961. Birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961 were published automatically from a birth registration list provided directly to the papers by the Hawaiian Department of Health. The notifications of births provided to the Health Department, however, were not only the product of information provided by hospitals and doctors, alone.
The distinction between the information used by the hospital to create a “Certificate of Live Birth” and the information used by the Department of Health to create a birth registration is that information used to create birth registrations were allowed to be submitted from anyone possessing credible information about the birth, including family members, witnesses or attendants, regardless of the actual location of the birth. Contrarily, the information on a “Live Birth” record must be verified and attested by a licensed medical doctor qualified to determine the characteristics of a live birth event. This is important in cases when a distinction was needed between a “still birth” and a baby that may have been born alive but then died upon delivery. In the latter case, both a birth certificate and a death certificate are required while a still birth requires only a death certificate because of the definition of a live birth under HRS 338-1.
Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother’s claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census figures. Unfortunately, these vital statistics reporting guidelines are not conducive with determining the natural born status of the child.
For example, the Bureau of Census in 1961 counted all residents by county regardless of their temporary absence at the time of the Census when the Census worker was able to identify residents of a county through the information provided by others. This applies even today. Therefore, beginning in as early as 1933, it was determined that births must be accounted the same way for all usual residents regardless of the mother’s location at the time of the event when that resident mother intended to return to that county. In Hawaii, if a child did not have an official certificate prior to the mother’s return, the local Health Department was obligated to provide one under the Model State Vital Statistics Act of 1942, Section 8 of Hawaii’s Public Health Regulations and HRS 338.
The impact of population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and agency resources was very significant in 1961. The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. Vital statistics are reported annually, but the Census only occurs every ten years which means there is large volume of population which goes untracked between Census years. If births and deaths were not allocated to the residents of each county, regardless of the location of the vital event, the results would cause large disparities when compared with the Census data. 

WARNING: The “Family Friendly” Film You Should NOT Take Your Kids To See

Warning:  The  “Family  Friendly”  Film  You  Should  Not  Take  Your  Kids  To  See


The indoctrination of our children seems to be “priority number one” of the radical left.  They see our youth as the means to cement their agenda and keep it growing through future generations to the point of eradicating any remnant of traditional values.

Children’s entertainment has often been used as a secret weapon to spread liberal propaganda, and now another disturbing message is hidden in what is being billed as a “family film.”

The live-action film Show Dogs portrays talking dogs dressing up and making jokes – every kid’s idea of a must-see.  Its premise is the behind-the-scenes antics of the world of dog shows. But parents who have viewed the film are warning others – do not take your kids to see this movie.

The plot seems innocent enough:  When a new dog, Max, enters a competition, the other dogs teach him about the dog show lifestyle and what is expected of him with lots of silliness along the way. But along with the grooming and behavioral tricks Max must learn, he is told that part of the judging involves touching and inspecting his private parts.

Max is obviously upset about this — and this is where the dark message of the film emerges.

Terina Maldonado reviewed the film for Macaroni Kid, and explains the blatant and obscene message, as reported by For Every Mom:
Max, of course, is  NOT cool with this, and when his partner Frank and a former champion show dog try to get him to accept this process, a certain dark and very dangerous theme for kids emerges.
Maldonado explains:
“Since the inspection of the private parts will happen in the finals, Frank touches Max’s private parts to get him used to it.  Of course, Max doesn’t like it and snaps at Frank for him to stop. Max is then told by the former champion, who has been through the process before, that he needs to go to his “zen place” while it happens so he can get through it.  More attempts are made by Frank to touch Max’s private parts, but Max is still having trouble letting it happen and keeps snapping at him.”
Max needs to get it together, see, and LET PEOPLE TOUCH HIS PRIVATE PARTS, or he might lose the competition and fail at his mission…
Newsflash, folks: THIS IS CALLED GROOMING and it’s what sexual predators do to kids!
It is bad enough that kids are seeing the discomfort that Max experiences at the idea of having his private parts touched.  But then, Max is encouraged by other characters to go to his “zen place” so he can mentally escape the discomfort.

This shameful scene smacks of what child predators tell their victims.  They are encouraged to keep the secret and mentally go to a “safe place” to avoid dealing with the abuse.

Maldonado describes another disturbing scene in the film:
The day of the finals come and if Max doesn’t let his private parts be touched, he may lose the competition…It all rests on his ability to let someone touch his private parts.  The judge’s hands slowly reach behind Max and he goes to his “zen place”.  He’s flying through the sky, dancing with his partner, there are fireworks and flowers – everything is great – all while someone is touching his private parts.
During the movie, I kept thinking, “This is wrong, it doesn’t need to be in a kids’ movie. Everything else in the movie is good fun except for this."
Afterward, my husband mentioned that he picked up on this message, too, as did my mother who saw the movie with us.
This sickening message buried in a supposedly lighthearted film for families is typical of the left’s push to indoctrinate our kids.

And while the liberal agenda is often hidden in children’s programming, this message is particularly frightening.  It seems to say, “even if it bothers you, sometimes you have to let someone touch you inappropriately.”

Maldonado is first and foremost putting the warning out for families to avoid taking their children to see Show Dogs.  But if they have already seen it because you weren’t aware of the content, she advises using it as a teaching moment for kids – making sure they know to never let anyone touch their private areas, and what they should do if it ever happens.

Maldonado concludes in her Macaroni Kid review:
We talked about how I didn’t feel that part needed to be in the movie.  We talked about how we never let anyone touch our private parts, and what they should do if anyone tries.  We reinforced that if anyone tries to touch their private parts or asks them to touch their private parts, they should talk to us about that.  We talked about different ways children can feel pressured to participate in those types of behaviors.  A child predator is usually known to the child, rarely are they a stranger.  We talked about bribes or threats.  We discussed the fact that that type of behavior is not a game.  We reminded them the same rules apply to kids as well as adults.
It boggles the mind how anyone who worked on this film would not immediately realize how inappropriate – and dangerous – this message is for children.

It is nothing new for the far-left in Hollywood to sneak their progressive message into every film that is produced, but to brainwash children to accept a dangerous situation is beyond comprehension.

Gone are the days of truly pure family entertainment.  Parents must now be on heightened alert for any underlying messages being sent to our children through their favorite television shows or in the latest “family” film.

What do you think of the disturbing message hidden in a movie marketed as “family friendly?” 


Eric Holder EXPOSED!

Eric Holder again commits SEDITION & TREASON

Eric Holder Just Activated Full Insurgency On Trump With Destructive Order For Traitors !!    

 By on

Former Attorney General Eric Holder under Barack Obama is inserting himself into the fight between Trump and Obama’s corrupt intel agencies. After the President rightfully called for an investigation into them, Holder stuck his nose where it does not belong once again. He’s trying to spin all of this in favor Obama of course. 

Holder tweeted: “Trump demand for DOJ investigation is dangerous/ democracy threatening. DOJ response is disappointing. There is no basis/no predicate for an inquiry. It’s time to stand for the time-honored DOJ independence. That separation from White House is a critical part of our system.”

There is more than adequate basis for an inquiry. Holder fears what will be found or he would not be objecting like this. How does it threaten 'democracy' to have the intel agencies be transparent as long as it does not endanger operatives? 

The Department of Justice is finally doing its job under President Trump. The DOJ is not independent. It is a government agency and is part of the Executive branch. The Department of Justice serves a different role than the Judicial branch of the federal government. Its functions are analogous to a local police department and the oversight of a district attorney. Their job is to enforce the law.

Holder called on DOJ employees to openly defy President Trump. That is called sedition. 

Holder tweeted, “More DOJ norms being eroded. Trump-a SUBJECT of the investigation-wants access to material related to the inquiry. His Congressional supporters want evidence connected to an ongoing investigation. Time for DOJ/FBI to simply say no-protect the institutions and time-tested norms.” He acts like he does not know that the DOJ answers directly to the President of the United States since they are part of the Executive branch.

Calling On DOJ Employees 
to Defy Trump Administration
 May 25 2018
Trump demand for DOJ investigation is dangerous/democracy threatening. DOJ response is disappointing.There is no basis/ no predicate for an   It's time to stand for time honored DOJ independence. That separation from White House is a critical part of our system.  

Holder telling his former employees at the Justice Department to defy a sitting President’s request of transparency and public disclosures of information related to the unprecedented spy operation launched in 2016 against the Trump campaign is unheard of. It definitely indicates that the corruption is deep and widespread over this. Holder is in effect encouraging the DOJ and the FBI to “protect the institutions” instead of carrying out their duties and protecting and upholding the Constitution.
I don’t care who you are, you don’t defy the President’s orders in order to protect government agencies. As I’ve said from the beginning, all of the alphabet agencies need an enema and to be repopulated with fully vetted individuals who are subjected to real and ongoing background checks. Holder, Obama, Kerry and others have been dissing President Trump from the start. Now, they are actively working against the President which amounts to treason in my book.

Memo to Holder… you no longer have anything to do with the White House. You have no influence or pull there, so beat it. Holder is frustrated with Attorney General Jeff Sessions and expressed it during comments at Georgetown. 

He questioned AG Jeff Sessions’ ability to stand up to President Trump. At one point, he had the nerve to say, “You run the damn Justice Department.” The comments by Holder appear to be blatant attempts to twist the truth to score political points. The man knows no shame.

  Eric Holder @EricHolder  More DOJ norms being eroded. Trump-a SUBJECT of the investigation-wants access to material related to the inquiry. His Congressional supporters want evidence connected to an ongoing investigation. Time for DOJ/FBI to simply say no-protect the institutions and time tested norms. 

Holder is the same guy that called the firing of Andrew McCabe dangerous. McCabe got caught lying and plotting a coup against Trump. He deserves far more than being fired… he deserves to go to jail. And by the way, President Trump did not fire McCabe. The FBI did and it was for corruption and lying under oath. Speaking to the Georgetown Institute of Politics and Public Service, Holder suggested that Sessions should have avoided firing former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe despite the FBI’s recommendation for him to do so. You mean he should have been kept on despite lying and plotting? Maybe under Obama, but not in the Trump administration.

McCabe was actually under investigation before Trump was even elected. Holder also accused Sessions of rushing the decision to fire McCabe, even though McCabe was actually forced to step down from his role as deputy director in January. That’s not rushing. The investigation into his conduct has been going on for more than a year. “It may be that at the end of the day his separation, his termination, is appropriate,” Holder said of McCabe’s dismissal. “But you know, you don’t rush that component to meet a deadline that I think the President essentially set.”

“You know, if you’re the Attorney General of the United States, you run the damn Justice Department,” he continued. “And you gotta have the guts to look at the President every now and again and say no.” You mean like you did while groveling before Obama? Right. 

Regardless, Sessions needs to do far more than he is currently doing and I don’t mean defying the President. Sessions leads the DOJ now, not Holder, who seems to be trying to activate some kind of defiant insurgency. He’s still meddling where he has no business and his actions are treasonous.

 Eric Holder just activated 
full insurgency on Trump
 with destructive orders for traitors !!!
May 24 2018
  Fox & Friends First @FoxFriendsFirst  HOLDER UNHINGED. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, slamming current AG Jeff Sessions over the McCabe firing.